Around January 1, 1993
Shanahan–Davis Contract and Arbitration Dispute (1993–1998)
A multi-year contract-payment dispute over roughly $250,000 that moved from early-1990s arbitration into public accusations after Mike Shanahan became Denver's head coach in 1995, culminating in Raiders executives circulating arbitration paperwork and threatening legal action in 1998 [15][18].
Quick Facts
What Happened
After Mike Shanahan's departure from the Raiders organization, he asserted that Al Davis owed him approximately $250,000 under a prior contract; the matter involved NFL arbitration in the early 1990s [15]. When Shanahan became the Broncos' head coach in 1995 he brought the dispute back into the public eye, publicly stating that Davis "told me that if I went to the Broncos, he wouldn't pay me the $250,000 he owed me" [15]. Raiders executives later countered by distributing a 1993 arbitration document they said showed a much smaller amount (reported as $32,625 by the club) and accused Shanahan of perjury, turning a contract disagreement into public recrimination [18]. In late 1997 and early 1998 the exchange escalated: Shanahan suggested Davis give disputed funds to the Oakland Unified School District, and Raiders CEO Amy Trask called Shanahan's public statements "pure, unadulterated malice" while warning of possible libel or slander litigation [18][15]. The back-and-forth mixed on-field rivalry with off-field legal-threat rhetoric and received sustained local coverage through 1998 [16][18].
What They Said
“He told me that if I went to the Broncos, he wouldn't pay me the $250,000 he owed me.”
“This was not only a reckless disregard for the truth... This was pure, unadulterated malice with the intent to screw this team and its owner.”
Why It Matters
This dispute is the clearest example of a personal feud between a coach and an opposing owner affecting the Broncos–Raiders rivalry off the field. The contract/arbitration disagreement converted a compensation matter into a public, interpersonal clash between Shanahan and Davis, and produced an exchange of precise claims and counterclaims about arbitration numbers that reporters traced from 1995 through 1998 [15][18]. Understanding the payment/arbitration fight explains why meetings between the teams in the mid–to–late 1990s had an extra layer of personal animus and headline-grabbing commentary [16][18].
What Happened Next
By February 1998 Raiders executives had circulated arbitration paperwork and publicly threatened litigation; contemporaneous reports do not record a widely published court judgment resolving Shanahan's $250,000 claim, and the public exchange faded from major headlines after 1998 [18][15]. Subsequent histories of the rivalry treat the dispute as a late-1990s public feud rather than an ongoing legal saga, and Shanahan later joked about some anecdotes tied to the feud in media interviews [17][15].