DC

Daniel Cormier

Light Heavyweight
VS
JJ

Jon Jones

Light Heavyweight
DORMANTLVL 4

"What caused the public feud between Jon Jones and Daniel Cormier, and how did in-cage results, social-media exchanges, and anti-doping rulings shape where their rivalry stands today?"

Jon Jones and Daniel Cormier's public feud began with two championship fights and escalated through repeated social-media taunts and anti-doping adjudications. Jones defeated Cormier at UFC 182 on January 3, 2015, and their UFC 214 rematch on July 29, 2017 was later overturned to a no-contest after a positive in-competition test [1][2][7]. The dispute centers on fight outcomes, documented Instagram exchanges, and USADA/commission rulings that altered records and reputations [5][3].

Quick Facts

Beef Started
Jan 3, 2015
Status
Dormant (no reconciliation)
Key Trigger
UFC 214 no-contest
Shared Team
UFC (light heavyweight)
Result
UFC 214 overturned
Sanction
15-month USADA

How It Started

Before their rivalry broadened into a public feud, Jon Jones and Daniel Cormier were the two leading figures at UFC light heavyweight, and their first sanctioned meeting set the competitive baseline. Their first in-cage meeting took place at UFC 182 on January 3, 2015, when Jones retained the light heavyweight title by unanimous decision (49–46 on all three scorecards) [1]. That result established Jones as the in-cage winner but left open narrative and legacy disputes that a single decision could not settle. Outside the Octagon, the earliest documented public escalation in this corpus occurred on March 1–2, 2016, when both fighters exchanged photo-manipulated Instagram posts and Cormier later deleted his post; media outlets captured screenshots and reported the episode [5]. The rivalry’s trajectory shifted from sporting competition to administrative and reputational conflict when Jones was removed from the July 6, 2016 UFC 200 card after USADA flagged a potential anti-doping violation related to clomiphene and letrozole, a development reported publicly and followed by a one-year suspension process [4]. That removal postponed an anticipated rematch and concentrated attention on Jones’ testing history. The combination of in-cage outcomes (UFC 182), social-media provocation (March 2016), and anti-doping interventions (July 2016 removal) set the scene for the defining incidents that followed in 2017 [1][5][4].

Timeline of Events

Timeline

Where Things Stand

As of the last adjudicated public record in this corpus, there is no verified reconciliation accepted by both parties and the feud is effectively dormant in public-facing channels. The most recent formal action was USADA's arbitration summary published September 19, 2018, which imposed a 15-month sanction retroactive to July 28, 2017 and stated the arbitrator found Jones 'not intentionally cheating' [3][8]. Administrative steps that altered official records include the CSAC overturn of the UFC 214 result to a no-contest on September 13, 2017 [2][7]. Cormier's last documented public-facing gesture in the immediate aftermath of the fight was an Instagram congratulations on July 31, 2017 [6]. Absent later public statements or corroborated meetings in the collected sources, any assertion of private reconciliation would be speculative and is not supported by the documents cited here [3][2][6].

Different Perspectives

The Jon Jones Perspective

From Jon Jones' side, the core issue is that his in-cage performances stood on their own merit while anti-doping adjudications produced nuanced outcomes; the independent arbitrator ultimately reduced the sanction and noted no intentional cheating [3][8]. Jones' camp emphasizes procedural findings and the arbitrator's language to argue the record should reflect complexity rather than simple culpability [3].

  • An independent arbitrator imposed a 15-month sanction but stated he 'found that Jon Jones was not intentionally cheating' in the USADA summary [3].
  • The in-competition positive was adjudicated through commission and arbitration channels (CSAC overturn; USADA arbitration), which Jones' side frames as following due process rather than an uncontested guilt finding [2][3].
  • Jones' victory at UFC 214 was recorded on the night as a third-round TKO before the CSAC later overturned the result to a no-contest, a sequence Jones' camp uses to highlight procedural reversal rather than in-cage ambiguity [2].
  • Earlier anti-doping matters (clomiphene/letrozole around UFC 200) resulted in a removal and suspension process led by USADA/NSAC, which Jones' side points to as separate adjudications with their own timelines and context [4].
  • Jones and his team have repeatedly pointed to the arbitration outcome and reductions in sanction length as evidence the matter was not a straightforward intentional violation [3][8].

The Daniel Cormier Perspective

From Daniel Cormier's view, the dispute centers on the integrity of title outcomes and the impact of testing results on legacy; Cormier accepted the in-cage stoppage at UFC 214 in his immediate public reaction but the subsequent overturn altered the official record that defines careers [6][2]. Cormier's public statements and conduct show a fighter responding first to the fight result and then to administrative rulings that changed the legacy calculus [6][2].

  • Cormier publicly congratulated Jones two days after UFC 214, writing 'Congratulations to Jon Jones and his team. They did a phenomenal job and got the victory.'—a public response recorded before the CSAC overturn [6].
  • The CSAC overturned the UFC 214 result to a no-contest after a confirmed in-competition positive for a Turinabol metabolite, which directly altered the bout’s official outcome and title lineage [2][7].
  • Cormier and supporters emphasize documented anti-doping findings (2016 clomiphene/letrozole issue and the 2017 Turinabol positive) as material to how the rivalry—and title legitimacy—should be judged [4][2].
  • From Cormier’s perspective, public social-media taunts (e.g., photo-exchange in March 2016; Jones’ July 2017 Instagram comment) heightened the personal stakes and public scrutiny surrounding the rematch [5][9].

Media and Fan Perspective

Media and fans saw the rivalry as two parts sport and one part controversy: two high-profile title fights produced clear in-cage moments while anti-doping rulings and social-media taunts created ongoing debate about legitimacy [1][2][5]. Coverage focused on documented events (fight results, commission decisions, arbitration) and archived social posts that kept the story in headlines [1][2][3][5].

  • The first fight at UFC 182 produced a unanimous-decision result (49-46 x3), a clean data point that media used as the competitive baseline [1].
  • UFC 214’s initial TKO finish and the later CSAC no-contest decision created a newsworthy reversal that outlets repeatedly covered and analyzed [2].
  • USADA’s public arbitration summary and resulting 15-month sanction added authoritative detail that shifted coverage from pure rivalry to regulatory consequence [3][8].
  • Social-media exchanges—documented Instagram posts and a July 4/5, 2017 taunt—provided quotable, archivable items that media repeatedly replayed in timelines and previews [5][9].

FAQ

Are Daniel Cormier and Jon Jones still feuding or have they reconciled?

As of the last documented public record in this corpus (USADA arbitration published Sept 19, 2018), there is no verified, mutually acknowledged reconciliation between Daniel Cormier and Jon Jones; public interactions in 2017–2018 were adversarial and administrative rulings remain the last confirmed developments [3][2].

What started the beef between Daniel Cormier and Jon Jones?

The rivalry began with sanctioned competition: their first title fight at UFC 182 on Jan 3, 2015, where Jones won by unanimous decision, and escalated due to social-media taunts and anti-doping findings (notably Jones' removal from UFC 200 on July 6, 2016 and the UFC 214 Turinabol positive) that brought administrative disputes into the public feud [1][5][4][2].

What happened between Cormier and Jones at UFC 214?

At UFC 214 on July 29, 2017 Jon Jones defeated Daniel Cormier by third-round TKO, but the California State Athletic Commission later overturned the result to a no-contest after Jones' in-competition sample (collected July 28) tested positive for a Turinabol metabolite [2][7].

Did Jon Jones receive a suspension for the UFC 214 positive test?

An independent arbitrator imposed a 15-month sanction on Jon Jones (decision summarized by USADA on Sept 19, 2018), applied retroactively to July 28, 2017; USADA's summary also quoted the arbitrator as finding Jones 'not intentionally cheating' [3][8].

Why was Jon Jones removed from UFC 200 in 2016?

Jon Jones was pulled from the scheduled UFC 200 rematch with Daniel Cormier on July 6, 2016 after USADA notified the UFC of a potential anti-doping violation; reporting cited positives for clomiphene and letrozole and a subsequent suspension by Nevada authorities [4].

Did Daniel Cormier publicly accept the UFC 214 outcome at the time?

Yes; two days after UFC 214 (July 31, 2017), Daniel Cormier posted on Instagram, 'Congratulations to Jon Jones and his team. They did a phenomenal job and got the victory,' reflecting his immediate public reaction before the CSAC later overturned the result [6][2].

Were the social-media exchanges between Jones and Cormier significant to the feud?

Documented social-media interactions—such as the March 1–2, 2016 photo-manipulated Instagram exchange and Jones' July 4–5, 2017 'By not making weight?' comment—kept the rivalry visibly public and amplified tensions during lead-ups to rematches, even though they did not themselves trigger regulatory actions [5][9].

How do the anti-doping rulings affect their official records?

The CSAC overturn of the UFC 214 result on Sept 13, 2017 removed Jones' in-cage TKO win from the official record (no-contest), and the subsequent USADA arbitration set a 15-month sanction retroactive to July 28, 2017—both actions changed how the bout and Jones' availability are recorded in regulatory and public records [2][7][3].

Sources

  1. [1]UFC 182: Jones vs. CormierESPN
  2. [2]Jon Jones vs. Daniel Cormier at UFC 214 overturned to no-contestMMA Fighting
  3. [3]Independent Arbitrator Imposes 15-Month Sanction for Jon JonesUSADA
  4. [4]Jon Jones gets 1-year suspension from Nevada Athletic CommissionESPN
  5. [5]Jon Jones blasts Daniel Cormier on Instagram, Cormier fires backMMA Fighting
  6. [6]Cormier Congratulates Jon Jones, Apologizes to Ref on InstagramSports Illustrated
  7. [7]Jon Jones reportedly stripped of title after failing UFC 214 drugs testThe Guardian
  8. [8]Jon Jones given 15-month suspension after arbitration in USADA caseMMA Fighting
  9. [9]Jon Jones Trolls Daniel Cormier on July 4th Celebration Instagram PostMMAWeekly